<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lucid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steamd.net/2008/02/lucid.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steamd.net/2008/02/lucid.html</link>
	<description>Rants, raves, and other geeky nonsense</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 08:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.steamd.net/2008/02/lucid.html#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamd.net/?p=47#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I don't know if they are doing Vista &#038; XP the same disc wise, but I purchased a "System Builders" copy of Vista Ultimate and it was essentially an OEM with the disc, a serial code sticker for the unit and no manual.

The vista migration thing is a load of dung, but if a business IT administrator properly sets up the vista computer, I don't see why business' couldn't perform the transition by the year and a half point. Though I do agree, it is ludicrous that microblows is pulling this little number.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if they are doing Vista &#038; XP the same disc wise, but I purchased a &#8220;System Builders&#8221; copy of Vista Ultimate and it was essentially an OEM with the disc, a serial code sticker for the unit and no manual.</p>
<p>The vista migration thing is a load of dung, but if a business IT administrator properly sets up the vista computer, I don&#8217;t see why business&#8217; couldn&#8217;t perform the transition by the year and a half point. Though I do agree, it is ludicrous that microblows is pulling this little number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
