Why Hillary Clinton Should Not Be President (Part 6)
In my first post of the Why Hillary Clinton Should Not Be President series, I mentioned the incident with Peter Paul and Stan Lee of their involvement with the Clintons during one of Hillary’s Senate campaigns. According to WorldNetDaily, the Clintons may face a fraud trial, a trial the Clintons have been trying to dismiss. Why this case hasn’t gotten more media attention is beyond me.
Just as Hillary has said in prior debates, it’s important the people understand who the candidates are, what they’ve done, and what they represent. Stan Lee and other comic book writers have written within the pages of many comic books that heroes are judged by their actions above anything else. Hillary’s actions tell a much different story than that of a hero. Amid allegations of corruption, lies, and a willingness to do anything to win, the picture couldn’t be any clearer: Hillary is not the one we need in the White House or any government office for that matter. Much like a vote for John McCain, to vote for Hillary is a vote for “more of the same”. Which is ironic because that’s the very thing Hillary claims she’s not about.
Actions speak much louder than words. Remember than the next time you’re at a voting booth.
March 22nd, 2008 at 1:36 pm
Well MSNBC doing it again,,,I see Bill Oreilly,, “Oh I mean Keith Oberman who acting like Bill Oreilly
March 22nd, 2008 at 1:37 pm
Barack Obama is a liar,,,
To all
Obama speech ,,,, Not sure if you caught Not only did Obama,,, Refuses to denounce him,, but even More,, He say in his own words,,,
Barack Obama was in church when Jeremiah Wright,, was spewing Anti-American, Racist ism ,,,, Those were his own words,,, barack was there
After going on keith Oberman ,Show obama said he would denounce that if he heard that language he would leave and not tolerate it , and denounce it
After he went on MSNBC,, he went on FOX CNN ABC
March 22nd, 2008 at 7:41 pm
Paul, I approved your comments only to show that I’m not one to censor an opposing point of view. Here’s the problem with your comments…there is no basis of fact in them whatsoever. Till you learn to voice your opinion in a more articulate manner and learn to write better, I think you’re going to find it difficult to get anyone to believe in what you’re writing about. Much of what you’ve written is nothing more than a run-on rant. Quite frankly, I can only make out half of what you’re saying.
Paul, I’ve said this to many people recently…it doesn’t make sense to judge Obama on the views of just one man. After all, it’s a well-known fact that black churches are quite different than other churches…something that most white people may not get due to the cultural differences. I’ve heard just about every black pastor make crazy comments about stuff. Doesn’t mean that every person who goes to that church believes in the same things. People who go to such churches are not obligated to believe every single word that a pastor says…even after going to the same church after 20 years. Sure, people get influenced. But I think Obama is much more educated and smart enough to not let the rants of an old pastor influence his own strong held beliefs. Obama believes whole heartedly in the teachings of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Those are teachings that greatly trump anything this pastor has had to say over the last 20 years. I seriously doubt this man could say anything that would greatly influence Obama to go against those beliefs.
We don’t know who the pastor really is, we don’t know this man, and we don’t know what he’s like. We’re basing our opinions entirely on the crap-fest that is being shown on the media. This to me is just the typical fear mongering and bullshit journalism that is the American political system. This isn’t a simplistic point of view…it’s just common sense. Obama has a very multi-cultural family. His father was a black man from Kenya and his mother is a white woman originally from Kansas. His immediate family stretches beyond the norms and is not your typical black family. To say he has a hidden agenda that favors the black community is ridiculous. That’s the sort of thing the Clinton campaign wants you to believe.
The difference between Geraldine Ferraro and Reverend Wright is that, unlike Ferraro, Reverend Wright doesn’t represent Obama’s campaign. What Ferraro did was a big no-no and Clinton didn’t say shit about it. On the other hand, Obama has outright denounced Reverend Wright which, for me, is good enough.
Also, what about what Jerry Faldwell and Pat Robertson have said in the past about 9/11? Do you think it’s seems somewhat hypocritical in that context?
If you really wanna know what Barack is about politically, go check out his Senate record at the Library of Congress website and view some of the bills he’s proposed to the Senate floor. Says a whole lot about what he believes in. You can call Obama a liar all you want but actions speak louder than words, Paul.