Archive for November, 2008

Ann Coulter never gets laid (Update)

My wife and I had a discussion about my latest blog post. My take was that Ann supported John McCain and yet when he lost completely bashed the hell out of him. My wife responded by saying that that wasn’t completely true, that Ann didn’t like John McCain from the beginning. Really? 

Now, I haven’t paid too much attention to Ann outside of her blog posts so I don’t know if there have been any moments where Ann has said “I don’t like John McCain”. Hell, I don’t think there’s been any moments when Ann Coulter has said “I’m voting for John McCain”.

Out of all the blog posts she made this year (approximately 48) only 4 show signs of criticism towards McCain (hereherehere, and here). A few of them do have some sharp criticism on McCain but none of them outright say “I’m not voting for him”. Most of them just say “McCain is too moderate” and that he’s not right-wing enough.

I’m very curious as to who she voted for because if she did vote for John McCain then she absolutely has no right to bitch. After all, why on Earth would you vote for someone you have little confidence in? Why would you vote Republican just because you’re a Republican even though you don’t like the candidate? Doesn’t make sense.

Honestly, if Barack Obama turned out to be a complete douche I would not have voted for him. In fact, I probably would not have voted for anyone this year.

I take that back, I would have done a write in and would have voted for Stephen Colbert. Hell, Ann could have done the same thing and put in a vote for her best buddy, Rush Limbaugh!  ;)

Ann Coulter never gets laid

I figure since Ann tries so hard to be controversial with the subjects of her blog posts, might as well get just as outlandish with mine. Consider her latest rant, entitled The Reign of Lame Falls Mainly on McCain. I mean, this woman is such a sore loser. Not only does she continue to bash Obama, but bashes the hell out of McCain too? Wouldn’t surprise me the least if Ann Coulter never gets laid. In fact, if that was the case then it would explain her rants. 

Last night was truly a historic occasion: For only the second time in her adult life, Michelle Obama was proud of her country!

This much contention can only mean one thing: a low self esteem. Face it, you’re just jealous, Ann.

The big loser of this election is Colin Powell, whose last-minute endorsement of Obama put the Illinois senator over the top. Powell was probably at home last night, yelling at his TV, “Are you KIDDING me? That endorsement was sarcastic!”

So what you’re saying is that had Colin Powell not have endorsed Obama then McCain would have won? That Powell put him so over the top that it caused a ridiculous win of over two-thirds of the electoral college? Did we watch the same election? You’re just pissed because a well-respected Republican didn’t vote for your guy. Speaking of which…

The winner, of course, is Obama, who must be excited because now he can start hanging out in public with Bill Ayers and Rev. Jeremiah Wright again. John McCain is a winner because he can resume buying more houses.

And we’re all winners because we will never again have to hear McCain say, “my friends.” 

Smooth move, ex-lax. You just managed to tear down both the candidates at the same time. Who the hell did you vote for? So your guy loses and you say, “Oh well! I didn’t like him anyways!”? Right.

After Bill Clinton won the 1992 presidential election, Hillary Clinton immediately announced that, henceforth, she would be known as “Hillary Rodham Clinton.” So maybe Obama can now become B. Hussein Obama, his rightful name.

Say it with me, Ann: President Barack Hussein Obama. Not B. Hussein Obama but President Barack Hussein Obama. Get used to it cause he’ll probably be your President for the next eight years. Notice that I said your President. Like it or not but he is your President just as much as he is mine. Last I checked, we’re both Americans and, as such, regardless on whether you agree with Obama or don’t particularly like the guy he still deserves your respect and be given the benefit of the doubt. I don’t particularly like G. “Dub-yah” Bush, in fact I pretty much hate the guy. Not because he’s a Republican and/or conservative, rather I feel that his actions over the last eight years made him one of the worst Presidents this country has ever seen. Obama hasn’t even made it into the White House yet and you’re already disrespecting him. Don’t be such a bitch, Ann.

This was such an enormous Democratic year that even John Murtha won his congressional seat in Pennsylvania after calling his constituents racists. It turns out they’re not racists — they’re retards. Question: What exactly would one have to say to alienate Pennsylvanians? That Joe Paterno should retire?

Tell me, Ann, have you ever been to Pennsylvania? How the hell do you know that Pennsylvania is full of retards let alone racists? For all we know 10% of the population in Pennsylvania could have down syndrome. I have no clue because I haven’t been to Pennsylvania. Murtha looks like an old fart so, to be honest, it wouldn’t surprise me at all if he thought Pennsylvania was full of racists. It’s not really all that different from you calling all Liberal “Godless”, right?

Apparently Florida voters didn’t mind Obama’s palling around with Palestinian activist Rashid Khalidi and Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, either. There must be a whole bunch of retired Pennsylvania Jews down there.

What are you insinuating, Ann? Are you implying that there’s something wrong with Americans who are of the Islamic faith? Who’s the racist here? And what the hell do Jews have to do with a couple of folks of Islamic faith? Doesn’t make sense.

Have you ever noticed that whenever Democrats lose presidential elections, they always blame it on the personal qualities of their candidate? Kerry was a dork, Gore was a stiff, Dukakis was a bloodless android, Mondale was a sad sack.

And what exactly are you blaming McCain for? Ah, right! Buying too many houses and saying “my friends” too much! 

This blame-the-messenger thesis allows Democrats to conclude that their message was fine — nothing should be changed! The American people are clamoring for higher taxes, big government, a defeatist foreign policy, gay marriage, the whole magilla. It was just this particular candidate’s personality.

Umm…not really. The American people really wanted change and have spoken. But what you speak of is lies. Obama isn’t going raise everyone’s taxes, isn’t looking to make government bigger, isn’t aiming for a foreign policy that is defeatist in nature, and isn’t going to make gay marriage legal nation wide. What you speak of is the same old FUD you’ve been preaching about for years and, quite frankly, you’re completely full of shit.

Republicans lost this presidential election, and I don’t blame the messenger; I blame the message. How could Republicans go after B. Hussein Obama (as he is now known) on planning to bankrupt the coal companies when McCain supports the exact same cap and trade policies and earnestly believes in global warming?

Republican’s lost this presidential election because McCain’s message sucked and, like you, was completely full of shit. His campaign was managed very poorly and his message wasn’t consistent at all. McCain and other Republican’s went after Obama using tactics and various messages that went over the line. And you’re criticizing them for it? Umm…seems to me that you agreed with these tactics and agreed with the message when they happened. But now that your candidate lost you disagree with them? Isn’t that a little two-faced?

Oh, and cut the B. Hussein Obama crap. He’s only know by that name by you. Again, his name is President Barack Hussein Obama. Period.

How could we go after Obama for his illegal alien aunt and for supporting driver’s licenses for illegal aliens when McCain fanatically pushed amnesty along with his good friend Teddy Kennedy?

Because doing so would be an instant loss in a ton of Hispanic voters. Use your brain.

How could we go after Obama for Jeremiah Wright when McCain denounced any Republicans who did so?

Because the Jeremiah Wright debate was already debated enough and nobody cared. Continuing to debate the issue would be like beating a dead horse. Again, use your brain.

How could we go after Obama for planning to hike taxes on the “rich,” when McCain was the only Republican to vote against both of Bush’s tax cuts on the grounds that they were tax cuts for the rich?

Again, because McCain tried to debate this issue and people didn’t buy it. Besides, Obama has said time and time again that his tax plans don’t necessarily involve a tax hike on the “rich”. Rather he simply wants taxes to be adjusted to match the rates that existed for people in the 1990’s for those making over $250,000. Chances are, most people making a little over $250,000 won’t even see an increase in their taxes at all. Those making under though will definitely see a reduction in their taxes. For many people, a vote for McCain would be a tax cut for everyone. Trickle down economics hasn’t worked, Ann. Again, use your brain.

And why should Republican activists slave away working for McCain when he has personally, viciously attacked: John O’Neill and the Swift Boat Veterans, National Right to Life director Doug Johnson, evangelical pastors Jerry Falwell, Pat Robertson and John Hagee, various conservative talk radio hosts, the Tennessee Republican Party and on and on and on?

As Palin might say, “Oh, Ann, there you go again!” I’ve read many of your blog posts over the course of this campaign and I haven’t heard you criticize McCain for attacking any of the said persons you describe. Seems kind of convenient for you to quickly dismiss McCain when he no longer serves your purpose.

As liberal Democrat E.J. Dionne Jr. exuded about McCain in The Washington Post during the Republican primaries, “John McCain is feared by Democrats and liked by independents.” Dionne proclaimed that McCain “may be the one Republican who can rescue his party from the undertow of the Bush years.”

Similarly, after unelectable, ultraconservative Reagan won two landslide victories, James Reston of The New York Times gave the same advice to Vice President George H.W. Bush: Stop being conservative! Bush was “a good man,” Reston said in 1988, “and might run a strong campaign if liberated from Mr. Reagan’s coattails.”

Roll that phrase around a bit — “liberated from Mr. Reagan’s coattails.” This is why it takes so long to read the Times — you have to keep reading the same paragraph over again to see if you missed a word.

Bush, of course, rode Reagan’s ultraconservative coattails to victory, then snipped those coattails by raising taxes and was soundly defeated four years later.

Err…what the hell are you saying? Are you trying to say that Republican’s haven’t been Republican enough? Umm…duh? The Republican party hasn’t been the same for years. If anything, it took the Bush administration and this election for folks to realize that the Republican party is morphing into an institution made up by right-wing nutjobs like yourself. 

I keep trying to get Democrats to take my advice (stop being so crazy), but they never listen to me. Why do Republicans take the advice of their enemies?

Obama isn’t crazy though. He’s extremely smart (smarter than you!). He ran a very clean campaign and said all the right things. Why on Earth would someone like Obama take advice from you?

Oh, and why do you insist on using the word “enemy” to describe Democrats and Liberals? Last I checked we’re all Americans here. Seems to me that the only one here trying to divide this nation is you!

How many times do we have to run this experiment before Republican primary voters learn that “moderate,” “independent,” “maverick” Republicans never win, and right-wing Republicans never lose?

Yeah, because, let’s face it, anyone who doesn’t agree with you or isn’t a right-wing Republican is evil. Again, funny how you haven’t really criticized McCain for being right-wing enough till now.

Indeed, the only good thing about McCain is that he gave us a genuine conservative, Sarah Palin. He’s like one of those insects that lives just long enough to reproduce so that the species can survive. That’s why a lot of us are referring to Sarah as “The One” these days.

Sarah Palin is indeed a right-wing nutjob and is definitely one of you. Problem is that she’s also a complete idiot (just like you!) who doesn’t understand the meaning of our rights given to us by the Constitution (just like you!). Man, she just might be your twin!

Like Sarah Connor in “The Terminator,” Sarah Palin is destined to give birth to a new movement. That’s why the Democrats are trying to kill her. And Arnold Schwarzenegger is involved somehow, too. Good Lord, I’m tired.

I like it! Senator: The Sarah Palin Chronicles! This week, Sarah learns that she’s actually a robot sent back from the future to ruin John McCain’s election. 

After showing nearly superhuman restraint throughout this campaign, which was lost the night McCain won the California primary, I am now liberated to announce that all I care about is hunting down and punishing every Republican who voted for McCain in the primaries. I have a list and am prepared to produce the names of every person who told me he was voting for McCain to the proper authorities.

We’ll start with former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee, former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and Florida Gov. Charlie Crist. Then we shall march through the states of New Hampshire and South Carolina — states that must never, ever be allowed to hold early Republican primaries again.

You gonna do this Robert DeNiro style as he did in The Untouchables? A Louisville Slugger would be a healthy choice. How about Joe Peschi style like he did in Casino. After all, the pen is mightier than the sword. 

While you’re at it, punish yourself. All you have to do is look in a mirror and see yourself for what you truly are. Once you do that then you can truly move on to bigger and better things.

For now, we have a new president-elect. In the spirit of reaching across the aisle, we owe it to the Democrats to show their president the exact same kind of respect and loyalty that they have shown our recent Republican president.

Starting tomorrow, if not sooner.

If that means showing Obama some real respect rather than bashing him with your “I hate all Democrats and Liberal” trash, then good for you. It would be nice for once to see a right-wing nutjob like yourself actually reach across the aisle, shake Obama’s hand and say, “I don’t always agree with you but I’m willing to give you the benefit of the doubt”. If you can’t even do that then, please, for the sake of the Republican party, just shut up! And, yeah, you can start tomorrow if not sooner. Good idea!

iPhone trumps RAZR as most purchased US consumer handset

Holy crap! If the iPhone is the number one handset sold in the US, this represents a big shift in how cell phones are treated in the US. Pretty much means that most cell phone buyers will be gravitating towards smart phones instead of the traditional cell phone. This is big.

Pixar’s “UP”: The only thing going UP is my enthusiasm

For several years now, every time a Pixar movie has been released I haven’t been disappointed. Well…I was maybe a tad bit disappointed with Cars but that one was following The Incredibles which was a monster of a movie. I still thoroughly enjoyed Cars though. Ratatoulle was an incredible surprise. You doubt yourself about the premise of the movie but once it gets going, boy oh boy is it good! Wall-E was just a different kind of movie but one that still has that magical Pixar touch.

Which brings me to the trailer for Pixar’s next movie, UP. I don’t know about you, but I can already tell this is going to be yet another Pixar movie that is clever, fun, and lives up to expectations. I mean, really, who doesn’t love an old guy with a “Get off my lawn!” kind of attitude?

(Either JavaScript is not active or you are using an old version of Adobe Flash Player. Please install the newest Flash Player.)

Ballmer disses Google Android

CNET News writes about how Microsoft Chief Executive Steve Ballmer believes that Google Android is financially unsound for Google:

They can hire smart guys, hire a lot of people, blah dee blah dee blah, but you know they start out way behind, in a certain sense.

If memory serves, Apple also started out way behind, Steve. But just one software revision later and they are way ahead. Smart designers make smart products. Even if Google is a bit hit and miss on the first go-round, further revisions of their software can likely push them ahead. Where the hell is Windows Mobile in all this? Where’s the same level of innovation? I used a Treo 750w for quite some time. I don’t see it. Do you not have smart guys over at Microsoft, Steve? What’s your point?

I don’t really understand their strategy. Maybe somebody else does. If I went to my shareholder meeting, my analyst meeting, and said, ‘hey, we’ve just launched a new product that has no revenue model!’…I’m not sure that my investors would take that very well. But that’s kind of what Google’s telling their investors about Android.

That’s because Microsoft’s entire business model is completely different. Microsoft has not ventured out into the kind of business models as Google has. Thus, Microsoft has no clue how these business models actually work. Steve, I’m sorry but you just don’t get it. Until you get it you’re never going to be able to explain to your investors how such a revenue model would work. 

Google doesn’t exactly bubble to the top of the list of the top competitors we’ve got going in mobile. They might someday. But right now…

…Apple is at the top of the list of top competitors. Remember them, Steve? Remember what you said about the iPhone?

(Either JavaScript is not active or you are using an old version of Adobe Flash Player. Please install the newest Flash Player.)

How’s that strategy working for ya? Steve, what you don’t understand is that design matters. It matters a whole lot. Apple gets it. Google gets it. It’s one of the main reasons why their business strategies are working right. They’re solving problems. They’re letting their products speak for themselves. What is Microsoft doing? 

I’m on the Windows Mobile site right now and I don’t see anything really revolutionary compared to what Windows Mobile was when I was using a Treo. Internet Explorer looks to be the same craptastic browser, incapable of browsing and rendering any site on the web like Safari on the iPhone or the Android Mobile Browser. You mean to tell me that a feature like that doesn’t matter? Plus, with ActiveSync available on the iPhone and reports of some solid enterprise solutions available for Google Android, the other benefits of Windows Mobile over other solutions is a bit moot. Granted, Windows Mobile 7 is supposed to address much this but…where is it? Just like Vista, delay after delay after delay.

Who’s way out behind now, Steve? Microsoft is. Sorry, Steve, you just don’t get it. Probably never will. Your best strategy is to retire now and put Microsoft in the hands of someone who does get it and is capable of taking your company in a better direction. Otherwise, just like Captain Ahab, you’ll end up sinking the good ship Microsoft in your quest to spear a great whale. Best of luck, Steve.

President Barack Obama: The New Frontier

Last night, as Barack Obama was elected President, I was reminded of John F. Kennedy’s New Frontier speech. If you’ve never read or heard this speech then you should. Below you’ll find a full transcript of the speech.

I believe that we are entering yet another New Frontier. Last night a wind was blowing; not just a breeze but a strong wind blowing across our country. Obama captured an astounding two-thirds of the electoral college. It’s very clear that this President was elected for the people by the people. As JFK said: “For the world is changing. The old era is ending. The old ways will not do.” Yes, folks, the election of Barack Obama as President is the start of another New Frontier ushering in a new era. Do you feel it? Change is coming!

John F. Kennedy (Democratic National Convention Nomination Acceptance Address):

Governor Stevenson, Senator Johnson, Mr. Butler, Senator Symington, Senator Humphrey, Speaker Rayburn, fellow Democrats, I want to express my thanks to Governor Stevenson for his generous and heart-warming introduction.

It was my great honor to place his name in nomination at the 1956 Democratic Convention, and I am delighted to have his support and his counsel and his advice in the coming months ahead.

Let me say first that I accept the nomination of the Democratic Party.

I accept it without reservation and with only one obligation, the obligation to devote every effort of my mind and spirit to lead our Party back to victory and our Nation to greatness.

I am grateful, too — I am grateful, too that you have provided us with such a strong platform to stand on and to run on. Pledges which are made so eloquently are made to be kept. “The Rights of Man” — the civil and economic rights essential to the human dignity of all men — are indeed our goal and are indeed our first principle. This is a Platform on which I can run with enthusiasm and with conviction.

And I am grateful, finally, that I can rely in the coming months on many others: On a distinguished running-mate who brings unity and strength to our Platform and our ticket, Lyndon Johnson; on one of the most articulate spokesmen of modern times, Adlai Stevenson; on a great fighter — on a great fighter for our needs as a Nation and a people, Stuart Symington; on my traveling companion in Wisconsin and West Virginia, Senator Hubert Humphrey; on Paul Butler, our devoted and courageous Chairman; and on that fighting campaigner whose support I now welcome, President Harry Truman.

I feel a lot safer with all of them on my side. And I’m proud of the contrast with our Republican competitors. For their ranks are so thin that not one challenger has dared to put his head up in the last twelve months.
 
I am fully aware of the fact that the Democratic Party, by nominating someone of my faith, has taken on what many regard as a new and hazardous risk — new, at least since 1928. The Democratic Party has once again placed its confidence in the American people, and in their ability to render a free and fair judgment and in my ability to render a free and fair judgment.

To uphold the Constitution and my oath of office, to reject any kind of religious pressure or obligation that might directly or indirectly interfere with my conduct of the Presidency in the national interest. My record of fourteen years in supporting public education, supporting complete separation of Church and State and resisting pressure from sources of any kind should be clear by now to everyone.

I hope that no American — I hope that no American, considering the really critical issues facing this country, will waste his franchise and throw away his vote by voting either for me or against me because of my religious affiliation. It is not relevant.

I am telling you what you are entitled to know: As I come before you seeking your support for the most powerful office in the free world — I am saying to you that my decisions on every public policy will be my own, as an American, as a Democrat, and as a free man.

I mention all of this only because this country faces so many serious challenges, so many great opportunities, so many burdensome responsibilities that I hope that it is to those great matters that we can address ourselves in the coming months. And if this statement of mine makes it easier to concentrate on our Nation’s problems, then I’m glad that I have made it.

Under any circumstances, the victory we seek in November will not be easy. We know that in our hearts. We know that our opponent will invoke the name of Abraham Lincoln on behalf of their candidate, despite the fact that his political career has often seemed to show charity towards none and malice for all.

We know it will not be easy to campaign against a man who has spoken and voted on every side of every issue. Mr. Nixon may feel that it’s his turn now, after the New Deal and the Fair Deal –but before he deals, someone’s going to cut the cards.

That “someone” may be the millions of Americans who voted for President Eisenhower but would balk at his successor.

For just as historians tell us that Richard the First was not fit to fill the shoes of the bold Henry the Second, and that Richard Cromwell was not fit to wear the mantle of his uncle, they might add in future years that Richard Nixon did not measure up to the footsteps of Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Perhaps he could carry on the party policies, the policies of Nixon and Benson and Dirksen and Goldwater. But this Nation cannot afford such a luxury. Perhaps we could afford a Coolidge following Harding. And perhaps we could afford a Pierce following Fillmore. But after Buchanan this nation needed Lincoln; after Taft we needed Wilson; and after Hoover we needed Franklin Roosevelt.

But we’re not merely running against Mr. Nixon. Our task is not merely one of itemizing Republican failures. Nor is that wholly necessary. For the families forced from the farm do not need to tell us of their plight. The unemployed miners and textile workers know that the decision is before them in November. The old people without medical care, the families without a decent home, the parents of children without a decent school: They all know that it’s time for a change.

We are not here to curse the darkness; we are here to light a candle. As Winston Churchill said on taking office some twenty years ago: If we open a quarrel between the present and the past, we shall be in danger of losing the future.

Today our concern must be with that future. For the world is changing. The old era is ending. The old ways will not do.

Abroad, the balance of power is shifting. New and more terrible weapons are coming into use.

One-third of the world may be free, but one-third is the victim of a cruel repression, and the other third is rocked by poverty and hunger and disease. Communist influence has penetrated into Asia; it stands in the Middle East; and now festers some ninety miles off the coast of Florida. Friends have slipped into neutrality and neutrals have slipped into hostility. As our keynoter reminded us, the President who began his career by going to Korea ends it by staying away from Japan.

The world has been close to war before, but now man, who’s survived all previous threats to his existence, has taken into his mortal hands the power to exterminate his species seven times over.

Here at home the future is equally revolutionary. The New Deal and the Fair Deal were bold measures for their generations, but now this is a new generation.

A technological output and explosion on the farm has led to an output explosion. An urban population revolution has overcrowded our schools and cluttered our cities and crowded our slums.

A peaceful revolution for human rights, demanding an end to racial discrimination in all parts of our community life, has strained at the leashes imposed by a timid executive leadership.

It is time, in short — It is time, in short for a new generation of leadership. All over the world, particularly in the newer nations, young men are coming to power, men who are not bound by the traditions of the past, men who are not blinded by the old fears and hates and rivalries– young men who can cast off the old slogans and the old delusions.

The Republican nominee, of course, is a young man. But his approach is as old as McKinley. His party is the party of the past, the party of memory. His speeches are generalities from Poor Richard’s Almanac. Their platform — Their platform, made up of old, left-over Democratic planks, has the courage of our old convictions. Their pledge is to the status quo; and today there is no status quo.

For I stand here tonight facing west on what was once the last frontier. From the lands that stretch three thousand miles behind us, the pioneers gave up their safety, their comfort and sometimes their lives to build our new West. They were not the captives of their own doubts, nor the prisoners of their own price tags. They were determined to make the new world strong and free — an example to the world, to overcome its hazards and its hardships, to conquer the enemies that threatened from within and without.

Some would say that those struggles are all over, that all the horizons have been explored, that all the battles have been won, that there is no longer an American frontier. But I trust that no one in this assemblage would agree with that sentiment; for the problems are not all solved and the battles are not all won; and we stand today on the edge of a New Frontier — the frontier of the 1960’s, the frontier of unknown opportunities and perils, the frontier of unfilled hopes and unfilled threats.

Woodrow Wilson’s New Freedom promised our nation a new political and economic framework. Franklin Roosevelt’s New Deal promised security and succor to those in need. But the New Frontier of which I speak is not a set of promises. It is a set of challenges.

It sums up not what I intend to offer to the American people, but what I intend to ask of them. It appeals to their pride — It appeals to our pride, not our security. It holds out the promise of more sacrifice instead of more security.

The New Frontier is here whether we seek it or not.

Beyond that frontier are uncharted areas of science and space, unsolved problems of peace and war, unconquered problems of ignorance and prejudice, unanswered questions of poverty and surplus. It would be easier to shrink from that new frontier, to look to the safe mediocrity of the past, to be lulled by good intentions and high rhetoric — and those who prefer that course should not vote for me or the Democratic Party.

But I believe that the times require imagination and courage and perseverance. I’m asking each of you to be pioneers towards that New Frontier. My call is to the young in heart, regardless of age–to the stout in spirit, regardless of Party, to all who respond to the scriptural call: “Be strong and of a good courage; be not afraid, neither be [thou] dismayed.”

For courage , not complacency, is our need today; leadership, not salesmanship. And the only valid test of leadership is the ability to lead, and lead vigorously. A tired nation — A tired nation, said David Lloyd George, is a Tory nation. And the United States today cannot afford to be either tired or Tory.

There may be those who wish to hear more — more promises to this group or that, more harsh rhetoric about the men in the Kremlin as a substitute for policy, more assurances of a golden future, where taxes are always low and the subsidies are always high. But my promises are in the platform that you have adopted. Our ends will not be won by rhetoric, and we can have faith in the future only if we have faith in ourselves.

For the harsh facts of the matter are that we stand at this frontier at a turning-point of history. We must prove all over again to a watching world, as we said on a most conspicuous stage, whether this nation, conceived as it is with its freedom of choice, its breadth of opportunity, its range of alternatives, can compete with the single-minded advance of the Communist system.

Can a nation organized and governed such as ours endure?

That is the real question.

Have we the nerve and the will? Can we carry through in an age where we will witness not only new breakthroughs in weapons of destruction, but also a race for mastery of the sky and the rain, the ocean and the tides, the far side of space, and the inside of men’s minds?

That is the question of the New Frontier.

That is the choice our nation must make — a choice that lies not merely between two men or two parties, but between the public interest and private comfort, between national greatness and national decline, between the fresh air of progress and the stale, dank atmosphere of “normalcy,” between dedication of mediocrity.

All mankind waits upon our decision. A whole world looks to see what we shall do. And we cannot fail that trust. And we cannot fail to try.

It has been a long road from the first snowy day in New Hampshire many months ago to this crowded convention city. Now begins another long journey, taking me into your cities and homes across the United States.

Give me your help and your hand and your voice.

Recall with me the words of Isaiah that, “They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run and not be weary.”

As we face the coming great challenge, we too, shall wait upon the Lord, and ask that He renew our strength.

Then shall we be equal to the test.

Then we shall not be weary.

Then we shall prevail.

Thank you.