<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Senior Citizen Speaks Out on Healthcare Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.steamd.net/2009/09/us-senior-citizen-speaks-out-on-healthcare-bill.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.steamd.net/2009/09/us-senior-citizen-speaks-out-on-healthcare-bill.html</link>
	<description>Rants, raves, and other geeky nonsense</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:51:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jwhitfield</title>
		<link>http://www.steamd.net/2009/09/us-senior-citizen-speaks-out-on-healthcare-bill.html/comment-page-1#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>jwhitfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 13:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamd.net/?p=925#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if the last comment is spam or not...but given the fact that it looks like some thought went into writing it, I&#039;ll post it. Definitely food for thought.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if the last comment is spam or not&#8230;but given the fact that it looks like some thought went into writing it, I&#8217;ll post it. Definitely food for thought.  <img src='http://www.steamd.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maguire</title>
		<link>http://www.steamd.net/2009/09/us-senior-citizen-speaks-out-on-healthcare-bill.html/comment-page-1#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>Maguire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamd.net/?p=925#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>There are so many aspects of this plan that the politicians keep overlooking though. The medical industry is wrought with overspending and has gone for too long without any regulation or oversight. Insurance premiums have gone up 138% for a reason and it isn&#039;t simply corporate greed.
Private insurance companies are a part of the problem, yes. When regarding health, private insurance never should have been allowed to be profitable business in the first place. For-profit insurance means requires a need to make money and inevitably that is going to affect the quality of the insurance that people are getting from the company. Companies don&#039;t want to spend money on an individual so they will take whatever measures necessary to ensure they don&#039;t have to. But the medical industry has been profiting all along as well. Procedural costs, visits, even x-rays cost varying amounts state to state, city to city and practitioners are being bounced around by pharmaceutical companies to try and make money while waiting a year or more for the insurance companies to pay up.
This may be why the US was ranked #37 according to the World Health Organization. http://www.ourblook.com/component/option,com_sectionex/Itemid,200076/id,8/view,category/#catid107
Either health care needs to become a single unit in which there are no privatized barriers, which we may have lost since the rejection of the public option by the Senate, or we find a way to actually bring health care back to a fair free market based standing. The entire industry is wrought with greed from every angle, physicians hiking costs, pharmaceutical companies giving incentives for pushing their products, lobbyists for insurance company interests, and lobbyists for pharmaceutical interests. Where do we draw the line? Health care has had nothing to do with actual care for well beyond two decades.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are so many aspects of this plan that the politicians keep overlooking though. The medical industry is wrought with overspending and has gone for too long without any regulation or oversight. Insurance premiums have gone up 138% for a reason and it isn&#8217;t simply corporate greed.<br />
Private insurance companies are a part of the problem, yes. When regarding health, private insurance never should have been allowed to be profitable business in the first place. For-profit insurance means requires a need to make money and inevitably that is going to affect the quality of the insurance that people are getting from the company. Companies don&#8217;t want to spend money on an individual so they will take whatever measures necessary to ensure they don&#8217;t have to. But the medical industry has been profiting all along as well. Procedural costs, visits, even x-rays cost varying amounts state to state, city to city and practitioners are being bounced around by pharmaceutical companies to try and make money while waiting a year or more for the insurance companies to pay up.<br />
This may be why the US was ranked #37 according to the World Health Organization. <a href="http://www.ourblook.com/component/option,com_sectionex/Itemid,200076/id,8/view,category/#catid107" rel="nofollow">http://www.ourblook.com/component/option,com_sectionex/Itemid,200076/id,8/view,category/#catid107</a><br />
Either health care needs to become a single unit in which there are no privatized barriers, which we may have lost since the rejection of the public option by the Senate, or we find a way to actually bring health care back to a fair free market based standing. The entire industry is wrought with greed from every angle, physicians hiking costs, pharmaceutical companies giving incentives for pushing their products, lobbyists for insurance company interests, and lobbyists for pharmaceutical interests. Where do we draw the line? Health care has had nothing to do with actual care for well beyond two decades.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwhitfield</title>
		<link>http://www.steamd.net/2009/09/us-senior-citizen-speaks-out-on-healthcare-bill.html/comment-page-1#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>jwhitfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamd.net/?p=925#comment-769</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the compliments! (and the constructive criticism!) I&#039;m definitely trying to refrain from having any sort of bias or preconceived ideas in my blog posts. I&#039;m not always successful...but I try nonetheless. Definitely referencing the resources I base my posts on is a great way to further legitimize what I write. 

Definitely agree with you when it comes to people who aren&#039;t in the know. I feel like there&#039;s been a progression within our society where more and more people are being &quot;dumbed down&quot; as you say. Granted, even among the wackos there are some good people. I think the biggest problem I see is the constant labeling and categorizing of just about every person, thought, or idea out there. Much of the fear mongering seems to be based on that. Everything has to fit within a certain principle: right-wing, left-wing, Republican, Democrat, conservative, liberal, moderate, etc. I think that&#039;s the reason why I don&#039;t like labeling myself as anything because my thoughts and ideas don&#039;t always fit into one mold. Doesn&#039;t make sense to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the compliments! (and the constructive criticism!) I&#8217;m definitely trying to refrain from having any sort of bias or preconceived ideas in my blog posts. I&#8217;m not always successful&#8230;but I try nonetheless. Definitely referencing the resources I base my posts on is a great way to further legitimize what I write. </p>
<p>Definitely agree with you when it comes to people who aren&#8217;t in the know. I feel like there&#8217;s been a progression within our society where more and more people are being &#8220;dumbed down&#8221; as you say. Granted, even among the wackos there are some good people. I think the biggest problem I see is the constant labeling and categorizing of just about every person, thought, or idea out there. Much of the fear mongering seems to be based on that. Everything has to fit within a certain principle: right-wing, left-wing, Republican, Democrat, conservative, liberal, moderate, etc. I think that&#8217;s the reason why I don&#8217;t like labeling myself as anything because my thoughts and ideas don&#8217;t always fit into one mold. Doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpwhistler</title>
		<link>http://www.steamd.net/2009/09/us-senior-citizen-speaks-out-on-healthcare-bill.html/comment-page-1#comment-757</link>
		<dc:creator>bpwhistler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamd.net/?p=925#comment-757</guid>
		<description>@jwhitfield: I&#039;m not sure I made it clear in either of my posts to your blog.  I enjoyed your writing.  It is obviously clearly thought out and articulated.  I wouldn&#039;t waste my time with rants, and certainly not replying to rants.  You can&#039;t have a reasonable exchange leading to learning and change with people that rely on fear mongering to get their points across.  

While the fear tactic might be effective for garnering support from the masses, I feel its long term effect is the &quot;dumbing down&quot; of our population.  They rely on emotional argument rather than fact.  I watched some YouTube videos recently of the Tea Party march on DC.  There were some definite crackpots that were highlighted.  I personally think that as a whole, the crackpots were the minority.  I think most of the people participating in those protests are good people with valid concerns.  When interviewed, they seemed uninformed and to a degree...illiterate.  I know some of the people that participated in this event.  They are far from illiterate.  But unfortunately because of the emotional nature of the topics and the fear tactic used by the media that these concerned citizens rely on for information, most people are truly uneducated/uninformed regarding the topics they are validly concerned about and protesting.

Your blog clearly sets you apart from the classic fear mongering and emotional appeals typically seen.  The elder rancher is probably a nice man with valid concerns...but he did nothing to educate me or allow me to have further debates on the topic based on his video.  I too looked at the pages he referenced and found none of the material he quoted...which tended to invalidate anything/everything else he said.  Clear and concisely referenced resource material is what sets the expert apart from the fear monger.  I get the impression from the little I have read on your blog that you are striving to be the former. 

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@jwhitfield: I&#8217;m not sure I made it clear in either of my posts to your blog.  I enjoyed your writing.  It is obviously clearly thought out and articulated.  I wouldn&#8217;t waste my time with rants, and certainly not replying to rants.  You can&#8217;t have a reasonable exchange leading to learning and change with people that rely on fear mongering to get their points across.  </p>
<p>While the fear tactic might be effective for garnering support from the masses, I feel its long term effect is the &#8220;dumbing down&#8221; of our population.  They rely on emotional argument rather than fact.  I watched some YouTube videos recently of the Tea Party march on DC.  There were some definite crackpots that were highlighted.  I personally think that as a whole, the crackpots were the minority.  I think most of the people participating in those protests are good people with valid concerns.  When interviewed, they seemed uninformed and to a degree&#8230;illiterate.  I know some of the people that participated in this event.  They are far from illiterate.  But unfortunately because of the emotional nature of the topics and the fear tactic used by the media that these concerned citizens rely on for information, most people are truly uneducated/uninformed regarding the topics they are validly concerned about and protesting.</p>
<p>Your blog clearly sets you apart from the classic fear mongering and emotional appeals typically seen.  The elder rancher is probably a nice man with valid concerns&#8230;but he did nothing to educate me or allow me to have further debates on the topic based on his video.  I too looked at the pages he referenced and found none of the material he quoted&#8230;which tended to invalidate anything/everything else he said.  Clear and concisely referenced resource material is what sets the expert apart from the fear monger.  I get the impression from the little I have read on your blog that you are striving to be the former. </p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwhitfield</title>
		<link>http://www.steamd.net/2009/09/us-senior-citizen-speaks-out-on-healthcare-bill.html/comment-page-1#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>jwhitfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamd.net/?p=925#comment-756</guid>
		<description>@bpwhistler: Thanks again for writing a great reply! I agree with just about everything you&#039;re saying. I definitely need to spend more time on citing my sources and making sure I backup what I say with references. Definitely will do my best from now on to do that. Great tips! I appreciate your honesty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@bpwhistler: Thanks again for writing a great reply! I agree with just about everything you&#8217;re saying. I definitely need to spend more time on citing my sources and making sure I backup what I say with references. Definitely will do my best from now on to do that. Great tips! I appreciate your honesty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bpwhistler</title>
		<link>http://www.steamd.net/2009/09/us-senior-citizen-speaks-out-on-healthcare-bill.html/comment-page-1#comment-753</link>
		<dc:creator>bpwhistler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamd.net/?p=925#comment-753</guid>
		<description>I find the elder ranchers video&#039;s &quot;interesting.&quot;  I also find your response &quot;interesting.&quot;  I have to admit that you posted links to the major sources of your rebuttal while the video totally assumed we the viewers accepted the narrator as not only truthful but as an expert in what he was speaking about.  But...when it comes right down to it, your &quot;reply&quot; to this video does the same thing as the video.  Your lack of references to your sources implies that we should trust you and accept you as an expert.  You might very well be expressing nothing but the complete truth.  I have no way of knowing without searching through the broad references you listed in the hopes of finding the related information.  

As a physician, when I write a journal article or presentation for consideration by my fellow professionals I am expected to include references to each of my sources for each of my points.  However you don&#039;t provide this point by point reference/bibliography.  As such, your rebuttal to this video series (as well as all your other postings) is the same as the video...nothing more than an opinion/editorial (op ed) piece.  You make statements and headers such as &quot;The Truth.&quot;  If you want your obviously well thought out and written articles to actually make an impact, try referencing each of your points to your source.  Include a bibliography.  If you actually have referenced the original bills and other official resources, then your work is already done.  Just include those links.  It won&#039;t be long and your site will be one of the most visited political blogs on the web, and you&#039;ll probably be getting calls from the media for interviews.  If you haven&#039;t actually referenced those resources in your article for your readers to check on, then you should start your op ed pieces with &quot;based on my reading and understanding this is my take on the matter&quot; or something to that &quot;tune.&quot;  Otherwise you are doing what so many others are doing in this hotbed of misinformation and misdirection, and you claim to be righteously correcting.  

Your blogs, while possibly quite true and well researched, without references to each statement of fact are no more informative than the rants of people like Ann Coulter.  If you were to research her rants, you would find there is a thread of truth behind them.  She just twists it to suit her political/PR agenda.  The reason people listen to her is because of the thread of truth...which is just enough when mingled with her fear mongering to gather a popular audience.  Many of her listeners are convinced that she is telling the complete truth because she tends to base her arguments on some tendril of truth.  Without that tendril...she would just be a media entertainer.  With the thread of truth she&#039;s a political pundit.  But like all pundits, it&#039;s difficult to discern the truth from entertainment.

I occasionally leave replies like this one on blogs I find that seem well thought out and written, in the hopes that more referencing will be included in future blog posts.  If this referencing is not included, I relegate the articles to more of what you refer to as &quot;the misinformation you take very seriously.&quot;  There is really no way to know (without complete referencing) that you&#039;re not just spreading more misinformation.

Cheers...Dr. BPW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find the elder ranchers video&#8217;s &#8220;interesting.&#8221;  I also find your response &#8220;interesting.&#8221;  I have to admit that you posted links to the major sources of your rebuttal while the video totally assumed we the viewers accepted the narrator as not only truthful but as an expert in what he was speaking about.  But&#8230;when it comes right down to it, your &#8220;reply&#8221; to this video does the same thing as the video.  Your lack of references to your sources implies that we should trust you and accept you as an expert.  You might very well be expressing nothing but the complete truth.  I have no way of knowing without searching through the broad references you listed in the hopes of finding the related information.  </p>
<p>As a physician, when I write a journal article or presentation for consideration by my fellow professionals I am expected to include references to each of my sources for each of my points.  However you don&#8217;t provide this point by point reference/bibliography.  As such, your rebuttal to this video series (as well as all your other postings) is the same as the video&#8230;nothing more than an opinion/editorial (op ed) piece.  You make statements and headers such as &#8220;The Truth.&#8221;  If you want your obviously well thought out and written articles to actually make an impact, try referencing each of your points to your source.  Include a bibliography.  If you actually have referenced the original bills and other official resources, then your work is already done.  Just include those links.  It won&#8217;t be long and your site will be one of the most visited political blogs on the web, and you&#8217;ll probably be getting calls from the media for interviews.  If you haven&#8217;t actually referenced those resources in your article for your readers to check on, then you should start your op ed pieces with &#8220;based on my reading and understanding this is my take on the matter&#8221; or something to that &#8220;tune.&#8221;  Otherwise you are doing what so many others are doing in this hotbed of misinformation and misdirection, and you claim to be righteously correcting.  </p>
<p>Your blogs, while possibly quite true and well researched, without references to each statement of fact are no more informative than the rants of people like Ann Coulter.  If you were to research her rants, you would find there is a thread of truth behind them.  She just twists it to suit her political/PR agenda.  The reason people listen to her is because of the thread of truth&#8230;which is just enough when mingled with her fear mongering to gather a popular audience.  Many of her listeners are convinced that she is telling the complete truth because she tends to base her arguments on some tendril of truth.  Without that tendril&#8230;she would just be a media entertainer.  With the thread of truth she&#8217;s a political pundit.  But like all pundits, it&#8217;s difficult to discern the truth from entertainment.</p>
<p>I occasionally leave replies like this one on blogs I find that seem well thought out and written, in the hopes that more referencing will be included in future blog posts.  If this referencing is not included, I relegate the articles to more of what you refer to as &#8220;the misinformation you take very seriously.&#8221;  There is really no way to know (without complete referencing) that you&#8217;re not just spreading more misinformation.</p>
<p>Cheers&#8230;Dr. BPW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jwhitfield</title>
		<link>http://www.steamd.net/2009/09/us-senior-citizen-speaks-out-on-healthcare-bill.html/comment-page-1#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>jwhitfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamd.net/?p=925#comment-714</guid>
		<description>Umm...ok. Not exactly sure what all that has to do with the current health care debate. ACORN has nothing to do with health care. What you&#039;ve written sounds a lot like the typical propaganda from the right and doesn&#039;t reflect reality all that well. About the only thing I can ascertain from it is that we also have to be concerned with illegal immigrants?

Which brings up a good point. I live in Dallas and Parkland hospital has a big problem with illegal immigrants receiving free health care. Personally, I don&#039;t want to live in a country that turns away anyone (illegal or not) from receiving health care when they are hurt or sick. But, at the same time, giving free health care costs a lot of money. Certainly there is an ethical way to handle this problem better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230;ok. Not exactly sure what all that has to do with the current health care debate. ACORN has nothing to do with health care. What you&#8217;ve written sounds a lot like the typical propaganda from the right and doesn&#8217;t reflect reality all that well. About the only thing I can ascertain from it is that we also have to be concerned with illegal immigrants?</p>
<p>Which brings up a good point. I live in Dallas and Parkland hospital has a big problem with illegal immigrants receiving free health care. Personally, I don&#8217;t want to live in a country that turns away anyone (illegal or not) from receiving health care when they are hurt or sick. But, at the same time, giving free health care costs a lot of money. Certainly there is an ethical way to handle this problem better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brittancus</title>
		<link>http://www.steamd.net/2009/09/us-senior-citizen-speaks-out-on-healthcare-bill.html/comment-page-1#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>Brittancus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.steamd.net/?p=925#comment-713</guid>
		<description>Now that E-Verify is becoming a nationwide verification application to extract 20 million plus illegal immigrants from businesses. It is now growing in aggressive performance for placing true US workers in the job line and outing illegal labor. This operation should now extend to certainly more purposeful uses? That means not just federal contractors but everybody who draws a pay check?  Should a health care reform pass all obstacles in the House and Senate chambers, it could have an invaluable function of checking people who are not only applicants for jobs, but health care reform registry. In the future it should be considered to vet a person’s nationality status, when applying for a mortgage? The United States banking system, financial institution were all but swept away on a deluge of corruption that has very sinister undertones in an organization called ACORN.


The Association of Community Organizations for Reform now is under state and federal investigations at this very moment.  Other involved institution impacted both Freddie Mac/Freddie Mae and a scheme incorporating underhand minority lending practices. But you might not have heard any of this, from the liberal media about the massive illegal alien mortgage accusations.  The whole debacle was the involvement in a corrupt enabling banking industry and ethnic lobbyists, using unethical methods, along with Bush administration to guarantee loans for low income and people that could not possibly afford mortgages.  Didn&#039;t Wall Street, the government regulators learn anything from the Savings and loan crisis in the 1980’s? 

GOOGLE—Michelle Malkin, she has her own blog and also Google illegal immigrants—mortgages—home loans. Find out about the shady deals which had a massive impact on the 2009 real estate crash. In Addition read how we as citizens and legal residents can demand permanent E-VERIFY. Tell the politicians in Washington at  202-224-3121 It’s about time they worked for the USworking man/woman, instead of paying-off favors to the wealthy business lobbyists? NUMBERSUSA &amp; JUDICIAL WATCH has more answers about corrupt lawmakers and the issues that effects us all. HELP AMERICA SURVIVE. BETTER START COUNTING YOUR PENNIES, BECAUSE IF THE DEM&#039;S PASS ANOTHER AMNESTY--WILL HAVE MILLIONS OF MORE DESTITUTE ILLEGAL ALIENS AND FAMILIES TO SUPPORT!. THE BUSINESSES THAT HIRE THEM WILL NOT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that E-Verify is becoming a nationwide verification application to extract 20 million plus illegal immigrants from businesses. It is now growing in aggressive performance for placing true US workers in the job line and outing illegal labor. This operation should now extend to certainly more purposeful uses? That means not just federal contractors but everybody who draws a pay check?  Should a health care reform pass all obstacles in the House and Senate chambers, it could have an invaluable function of checking people who are not only applicants for jobs, but health care reform registry. In the future it should be considered to vet a person’s nationality status, when applying for a mortgage? The United States banking system, financial institution were all but swept away on a deluge of corruption that has very sinister undertones in an organization called ACORN.</p>
<p>The Association of Community Organizations for Reform now is under state and federal investigations at this very moment.  Other involved institution impacted both Freddie Mac/Freddie Mae and a scheme incorporating underhand minority lending practices. But you might not have heard any of this, from the liberal media about the massive illegal alien mortgage accusations.  The whole debacle was the involvement in a corrupt enabling banking industry and ethnic lobbyists, using unethical methods, along with Bush administration to guarantee loans for low income and people that could not possibly afford mortgages.  Didn&#8217;t Wall Street, the government regulators learn anything from the Savings and loan crisis in the 1980’s? </p>
<p>GOOGLE—Michelle Malkin, she has her own blog and also Google illegal immigrants—mortgages—home loans. Find out about the shady deals which had a massive impact on the 2009 real estate crash. In Addition read how we as citizens and legal residents can demand permanent E-VERIFY. Tell the politicians in Washington at  202-224-3121 It’s about time they worked for the USworking man/woman, instead of paying-off favors to the wealthy business lobbyists? NUMBERSUSA &amp; JUDICIAL WATCH has more answers about corrupt lawmakers and the issues that effects us all. HELP AMERICA SURVIVE. BETTER START COUNTING YOUR PENNIES, BECAUSE IF THE DEM&#8217;S PASS ANOTHER AMNESTY&#8211;WILL HAVE MILLIONS OF MORE DESTITUTE ILLEGAL ALIENS AND FAMILIES TO SUPPORT!. THE BUSINESSES THAT HIRE THEM WILL NOT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
