The irony of this just kills me. The two do kinda go together though. They both kind of invoke a religious experience. Makes you wonder…could you smuggle in a bunch of cocaine behind the Mona Lisa? Maybe some heroin inside a Van Gogh?
Back in 2001, like so many other folks in the tech industry, I got laid off and had a hard time finding another job. I ended up working as a computer technician at the tech desk of a local Best Buy. So when I read about the shenanigans Best Buy puts customers through with computer optimizations at The Consumerist[1] I was not at all surprised by what I read.
Back when I worked at Best Buy, we were encouraged to offer customers computer optimizations. By encouraged I mean we were forced shove computer optimizations down the throats of all customers buying computers. We were told to tell the customer just about anything to get them to buy them: “Your computer will get a virus if you don’t!” or “Your computer won’t run as fast without the optimization!” or even better “The latest updates will take you hours to download and install! We can do it in just minutes!” All of these are a bit of a stretch. Most customers would respond with, “So, you’re telling me that this brand new computer I’m buying isn’t nearly as fast as it should be and won’t work right out of the box?” Yes, Mr. Customer, that’s exactly what Best Buy is trying to tell you.
For a brief time, that was actually true…but that was when a nasty virus was running rampant and caused some Windows XP to get it without doing anything other than get online. For a while we were able to apply the security patches and run a computer optimization on just about every computer in the store prior to purchase and then charge the customer for the optimization. Just like Betty in The Consumerist story, we were selling computers with the optimization already done. Customers didn’t have a choice. The reality was that the customer was getting a pretty good deal. The Windows XP service pack that fixed the issue was over 200 megabytes which, for most people, would take about an hour or more to download. Since we already downloaded it, all we had to do was install it and optimize the computer a bit. Instant $30 for just a bit of work. Problem is that this only lasted for a few weeks. We couldn’t use that as an excuse once most computers were being shipped with the appropriate security patches already pre-installed.
So, if security issues and large patches aren’t an issue then why would a computer optimization be a good deal? And why should any customer be forced to pay for one if they didn’t ask for it? My take is that value is in the eye of the beholder. If your going to pay $40 for something it should have some kind of value attached to it.
When I was doing computer optimizations, I would make sure that the customer got their money’s worth. I built an automated routine that would install not only the latest patches onto the computer but also a few other bits that would help keep the computer clean. I would also optimize the computer so that certain pre-installed programs don’t run automatically. This varied from model to model. Some models had a lot of crap starting up when you fired up the computer which really slowed things down. Some didn’t have much at all. So if it’s just patches then you’re not really getting your money’s worth. It’s stuff that you can do yourself by just getting online and autoupdating the computer. There were other little optimizations here and there that we did but nothing earth shattering that would boost a computer’s performance by 200%. That would be ridiculous. That alone is what makes computer optimizations a complete rip-off.
As for antivirus software installs, I honestly believe we ripped off customers. I mean, why would you pay an extra $30 just to have someone install software that you can install yourself? I understand that there are people who don’t know much about computers and would rather pay someone to do all that stuff for them. If you’re one of those people then, to be honest, you’re a sucker. Seriously, instead of paying someone, learn to do this stuff yourself. It’s not that hard. Otherwise, you’ll continue throwing money away for no other reason other than you’re lazy.
Is up-to-date antivirus software a good thing to consider when you get a new computer? Absolutely. In fact, I believe every computer salesman should let customers know about their options and educate customers when they buy a new computer. If you’re buying a Mac then antivirus software is less of a problem. But on a new Windows machine? Yes, you might want to consider some antivirus software. While the software pre-installed on the computer might work, usually it’s on a trial basis of about three months or so. Rather than forget to update your software three months later, you might want to consider just buying a good antivirus program that gives you a full year of updates. Otherwise, you put yourself at risk of getting virus or malware infections, which is never fun to contend with.
Bottom line is that laziness is why Best Buy is able to extort so many people into getting optimizations. The average computer buyer really doesn’t know much about computers, so when a Best Buy staff member tells them all the nasty things that can happen if they don’t get the optimization then they feel stupid and end up giving in simply because they don’t know enough to say no!
So, what can you do to protect yourself? Simple. Learn something about the computer you’re using and/or buying! Learn to do stuff yourself rather than relying on other people to do it for you! I don’t care how you do it: read a book, go to a class, get someone to teach you. Whatever method you need to learn how to use and maintain a computer, do it!
UPDATE:
Here a video from Consumer Reports about Best Buy computer optimizations:
Last week, I talked about my frustration with Best Buy’s price discrepancies between their online and in-store prices for DVD’s. To further prove my point, I took a peek at Best Buy’s latest Sunday ad. I took a look at the various products in their ad but didn’t see any discrepancies for larger items like TV’s, appliances, and such. It would seem that the discrepancies center mainly around digital media like CD’s and movies. Haven’t spotted any discrepancies with console and PC games but it’s probably just a matter of time before I spot some.
So, what did I find this week? Let’s look at CD’s first:
This is the really odd ones that don’t make any sense. You’d think that the new releases would be subject to some discrepancies, right? Nope! In fact, the discrepancies center around the Holiday Music Favorites. Want that new Josh Groban Christmas album? You might wanna buy it online and save yourself $2:
And here’s an even odder one. See that album just above the Josh Groban one? A Very Special Christmas Vol.7 for just $7.99? For once I found an item that is actually cheaper to buy in the store than online. How messed up is that?
Now let’s move to the first of the movie discrepancies. There’s a couple here that stick out:
Again, same as last week…err…why is the Inglorious Basterds Blu-ray version being sold for $5 less online? Is this a special “online only” deal? If so, why don’t they say so?
And, yes, while the above pick says “pre-order” I just checked the site again and it’s still listed at the same price. Oddly enough, the two-disc DVD isn’t in the ad but I bet you money that it’s still gonna be a $1 cheaper on the site ($21.99 online versus $22.99 in-store).
Is there something going on with the Blu-ray new releases? Why is The Hangover listed for $4 cheaper?
On this last movie page, none of these really stick out…except one. Can you guess which one is gonna be a $1 less?
Yep…Robot Chicken! The one damn DVD I would buy this week and I still have to price check it online! Damn you Best Buy!
Is it me or does it seem like all these price discrepancies revolve around new release movies that they know they can move fast and make a few extra bucks on without many people noticing? I think there’s a pattern forming. Guess we’ll know when I look at next week’s ads. 
I don’t buy a whole lot of movies and music but when I do I usually check Amazon, Best Buy, and a few other sites to see who has the better deal. If Amazon or another competitor is offering a wildly better deal with free shipping I’ll go into Best Buy and hit them up for a price match. If the difference is only a few bucks I’ll sometimes just buy from Best Buy and call it a day. However, lately I’ve been noticing that it isn’t always the competitor I have to price match…it’s also Best Buy themselves!
If there’s one thing about Best Buy that has annoyed me the most lately it’s the fact that their in-store pricing doesn’t always match their website. Why?! It doesn’t make any sense to me at all. The way I see it, Best Buy is essentially taking money from customers due to a technicality. It’s almost the same way that cell phone companies rob you of $2 every month due to your own stupidity[1].
For instance, just yesterday I stopped at Best Buy to pick up a copy of Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. The price listed on Best Buy’s site was $21.99. However, when the clerk scanned it the price came up as $22.99. The clerk price matched it on the spot but still it shouldn’t even happen in the first place. Want proof? Here’s the page from Best Buy’s own ad from last Sunday’s paper:
Notice the price of the 2-Disc Special Edition? $22.99, right? Now, here’s what was listed on their website the week of the sale:
Kind of odd, isn’t it. Same DVD from the same company and yet there’s a $1 price difference. What’s worse is that the Blu-ray version is listed for $2 cheaper as well:
Since when is Blu-ray cheaper than DVD? I mean, WTF?! There is no logical reason why the same product should be sold at two different prices from the same company.
This isn’t the only time this has happened either. It happened when I bought Pixar’s Up DVD ($2 difference in price). I’m almost certain that the same applied when I bought Watchmen, Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen, and X-Men Origins: Wolverine. That’s an extra $5 to $10 Best Buy could have gotten out of me had I not paid attention.
This got me wondering: How many customers buy stuff from Best Buy without noticing the price difference between their in-store and website? Granted, we’re talking about a price difference of only a dollar or two, but add that up over thousands of sales and you’ll likely end up with a nice amount to pad the bottom-line. I’m starting to wonder if Best Buy does this on purpose.
Now, I can understand if Best Buy was offering an online only deal but this isn’t one of those kind of deals. It’s your typical everyday new DVD release. Like me, I would imagine that a lot of people check online to see what the price is before driving to the store to buy it. If the price difference was more than a few bucks most people would notice. But make it just a buck or two and you’ll find that a lot of people end up buying stuff and not noticing. This is the behavior that I think Best Buy is anticipating. They’re anticipating that you won’t notice an extra buck being added to the cost. And since a lot of people would much rather drive to the store rather than having it shipped to them this behavior works to their advantage.
This is a practice that I believe Best Buy needs to stop. The fact of the matter is that Best Buy is still a brick-and-mortar operation regardless of whether they sell stuff online. The two part of their business can’t be treated as separate entities with different pricing models. If a product listed on their site isn’t a special online-only deal then the price listed should be reflective of how much it is in their stores and vice-versa. That’s what customers expect and how it should be.
So the next time you shop at Best Buy, be sure and check the price online before you get to the checkout. The price listed in their stores may not always be the same price as shown on their website. If Best Buy continues this practice I may have to up the ante and expose this. I’m sure there are plenty of news organizations that would love to hear about this. ;)
Last week I watched a story on HDNet World Report about Dr. Lee Carhart, one of the few remaining doctors performing late-term abortions. This story really hit home for me because it illustrates what I believe to be the true face of the whole abortion issue. When you set aside any ideology or beliefs about abortion, what you’re left with are women who truly need help. Any woman who has been raped and got pregnant as a result or has faced a pregnancy that could result in the loss of life knows exactly what is at stake. Watching this story may help others to fully grasp why choice is important when it comes to abortion rights.
Here’s an excerpt:
Alex Rodriguez is a liar, plain and simple. He’s full of shit and just keeps telling lie after lie after lie. There’s just no escape from the truth at all. Not only did he disgrace himself due to steroid use, he comes out and claims that he didn’t know he was doing anything wrong and didn’t know what he was taking? Bullshit, A-Rod! I could see it in your face when you were stating all that crap during a press conference.
Best thing you can do, Alex, is come completely clean and start telling the truth, the complete truth! Otherwise you end up further disgracing yourself and disgracing the entire sport of baseball. We’ve already had one guy before you who broke the homerun record and was linked to steroid use (McGuire anyone?). Pretty much means that whenever the next person breaks a homerun record, you can be sure everyone will be wondering whether this person is on steroids or some other performance enhancing drug.
Thanks A-Rod! Thanks for ruining baseball for everyone! You’re my hero!
I love drinking Shiner Bock but, trust me, I doubt you’ll find me pouring any of it out just so I can run my car on it. Still, just the idea of being able to make biofuel out of beer is kinda cool. I mean, if a gallon of biofuel made from beer was actually cheaper than the real thing you can definitely count me in. Imagine driving down the road on a full tank of beer biofuel. That’ll make the guys at Budweiser squeal for sure. ;)
A bit late but still interesting reading. Read a story last week on Huffington Post about the parallels of Buddhism and the movie “Groundhog Day”. Very interesting.
If there’s one post on my blog that has received the most attention, it’s my Why Hummers Suck post. Not only did I get tons of comments but I also got the attention of the Club Hummer Off Road website. In the end, I learned that not everyone who drives a Hummer is a bad guy. Just because a bunch of them act like jackasses doesn’t mean that everyone who drives a Hummer is one.
Based a recent comment, I’m going to reiterate one point before continuing on: Regardless of how you feel about anyone who drives a Hummer, none of them deserve to have their property keyed, kicked and/or damaged. Feel free to express how you feel, give them the finger, call them names if you’d like, but don’t damage their property out of spite. That’s just stupid and ignorant.
Recently, I read a Wired article that revealed a very surprising statistic: Hummer drivers get more tickets than your average driver…nearly 5 times more! Based on survey data of approximately 1.7 million drivers, the Quality Planning Corp. found that drivers of the Hummer H2 and H3 get 4.63 times more traffic tickets than the average driver. Raj Bhat, president of Quality Planning, had this to say about the results:
The sense of power that Hummer drivers derive from their vehicle may be directly correlated with the number of violations they incur, or perhaps Hummer drivers, by virtue of their driving position, are less likely to notice road hazards, signs, pedestrians and other drivers.
So either they can’t drive worth a damn because of the size of their vehicle? Or is it because all Hummer drivers are just jerks? The stigma it seems is that all Hummer drivers think they are kings of the road and, as such, normal rules just don’t apply to them. Would that explain the results of this study? Maybe. Maybe not.
What is really odd is that, according to the study, drivers of the Chevy Tahoe, which is what the Hummer is based on, are least likely to get tickets. This suggests that the trend doesn’t necessarily apply to most SUV drivers…just Hummer drivers.
Now, does that mean that we can draw the conclusion that all Hummer drivers are assholes? No, it doesn’t. All this says is that out of all the folks getting ticketed, Hummer drivers happen to be the biggest offenders. However, it does make me wonder: What does this say about the average Hummer owner’s driving habits? I’ll leave you, the reader, the opportunity to draw your own conclusions.
Twitter: jeffwhitfield
